Original Research

Life stories of families with a terminally ill child

S Hechter, M Poggenpoel, C Myburgh
Curationis | Vol 24, No 2 | a830 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v24i2.830 | © 2001 S Hechter, M Poggenpoel, C Myburgh | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 28 September 2001 | Published: 28 September 2001

About the author(s)

S Hechter, Faculty of Education and Nursing, RAU, South Africa
M Poggenpoel, Faculty of education and nursing, RAU, South Africa
C Myburgh, Faculty of education andnursing, RAU, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (323KB)

Share this article

Bookmark and Share

Abstract

Family units with a terminally ill child have a tendency to withdraw and this isolation may lead to problems in their mental health. A tendency with psychologists, clergy and helpers from other professions is to act as ideal experts on the lives of saddened people. From painful personal experience, this does not seem to enable acquiescence. Therefore, the aim of research on families with terminally ill children, was to explore and describe their lives and to develop an approach to facilitate their families to obtain acquiescence. In this article however, attention will be given to the life-world of families with terminally ill children. The research consists of two phases. In phase one the experiences of four families with terminally ill children are explored and described by means of phenomenological, unstructured, in-depth interviews. In phase two an acquiescence approach, which was designed for educational psychologists to facilitate families with terminally ill children to achieve acquiscence, is described. This approach is based on results from phase one. This article focuses on phase one. In this phase four families were interviewed individually, in the privacy of their homes. The interviews were audiotaped, and were transcribed for the purpose of data gathering. The data was analysed according to Tesch’s method and a literature control was performed to verify the results. Guba’s model for the validity of qualitative research was used.

Keywords

No related keywords in the metadata.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 1845
Total article views: 2564


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.