Original Research

The dependent, independent and interdependent functions of the nurse practitioner - a legal and ethical perspective

C. Searle
Curationis | Vol 5, No 4 | a444 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v5i4.444 | © 1982 C. Searle | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 27 September 1982 | Published: 27 September 1982

About the author(s)

C. Searle,, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (262KB)

Share this article

Bookmark and Share

Abstract

In general, contemporary nursing literature from Western countries does not take a bold stand on the very controversial issue of the dependent and independent functions of the nurse practitioner. The authors write as if they are skating on very thin ice. Text books on nursing imply a great deal about the practice potential of nurses but ever and anon there is a subtle reversion to the concept that nursing has certain dependent functions, meaning functions that require a doctor’s authorisation, and certain independent functions that are carried out on the nurse’s own initiative, and responsibility. In general the majority of authors consulted appear to subscribe to the concept postulated by Sarney when he says A good nursing practice act will separate the independent functions (what nurse can do on her own) from the dependent functions (what she can do only under the direction o f a doctor) (Sarney 1968 : 18).

Keywords

No related keywords in the metadata.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 14102
Total article views: 27374

 

Crossref Citations

1. The extended role of the nurse: reviewing the implications for practice
Karen E. Rose, Heather A. Waterman, Andeew B. Tullo
Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing  vol: 1  issue: 1  first page: 31  year: 1997  
doi: 10.1016/S1361-9004(97)80031-3