Original Research

Public opinion regarding alternative medicine

M. Hammond
Curationis | Vol 5, No 2 | a400 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v5i2.400 | © 1982 M. Hammond | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 27 September 1982 | Published: 27 September 1982

About the author(s)

M. Hammond,, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (202KB)

Abstract

Fairly widespread disillusionment in medicine since the 1950s (when many wonder drugs proved themselves either ineffective or harmful - or both, and when disease was found to be as prevalent as ever, even if in degenerative and stress-related guises), seems to have coincided with considerable public interest in alternative forms of healing. Some authors have given sympathetic attention to alternatives like homeopathy, chiropractic, herbalism and so on, but most of the literature still deals with these healers in a patronising if not blatantly biased manner. The abundance of emotive, highly critical reporting in the popular press, coupled with the relative lack of detailed, up-to-date studies and the persistence of ideas put forward by those in positions of power and status has caused a situation where most common knowledge about alternatives is nothing short of mythical.

Keywords

No related keywords in the metadata.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 2840
Total article views: 2251


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.