Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Original Research
Use of physical restraint in hospital patients: A descriptive study in a tertiary hospital in South Africa
Submitted: 06 September 2015 | Published: 10 November 2016
About the author(s)
Sebastiana Z. Kalula, Division of Geriatric Medicine, The Albertina and Walter Sisulu Institute of Ageing in Africa, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, South AfricaSabela G. Petros, Department of Medicine, The Albertina and Walter Sisulu Institute of Ageing in Africa, University of Cape Town, South Africa and Provincial Department of Health, Western Cape Province, South Africa, South Africa
Abstract
Objective: To document the prevalence of physical restraint use, patient characteristics associated with physical restraint use, and nurses’ and doctors’ knowledge and perceptions towards the practice.
Methods: A cross-sectional study of 572 patients, of whom 132 were physically restrained, was conducted in acute wards of a tertiary hospital. Data were collected on the 132 physically restrained patients. Fifty-nine doctors and 159 nurses completed a specially constructed questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were derived and expressed as numbers and percentages.
Results: Prevalence of restraint use was 23% (132/572). The distribution in acute wards was: medical 54.5%; surgical 44.7%; maternity 0.8%; psychiatry none. Mean age (SD) of the restrained patients was 49 years (20.5); 53.8% were male. The commonest types of restraints used were bed rails 93% and wrist belts 12%. Restraints were used largely to protect medical devices and as protection from harm. Less than 15% of the nurses reported having received training and 36% of the doctors reported having received some guidance on the use of restraints. Only a minority of nurses and doctors knew of a hospital policy on restraint use. Documentation on the prescription and indication for the use of restraint was poor.
Conclusion: Prevalence of restraint use is high and poorly coordinated. A policy on the use of restraint and comprehensive guidelines should be developed to guide health care practitioners in the management of patients where restraint cannot be avoided.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 7888Total article views: 14277
Crossref Citations
1. Involuntary treatment in dementia care at home: Results from the Netherlands and Belgium
Angela M. H. J. Mengelers, Vincent R. A. Moermans, Michel H. C. Bleijlevens, Hilde Verbeek, Elizabeth Capezuti, Frans Tan, Koen Milisen, Jan P. H. Hamers
Journal of Clinical Nursing vol: 31 issue: 13-14 first page: 1998 year: 2022
doi: 10.1111/jocn.15457
2. Effectiveness of CRSCE-Based De-escalation Training on Reducing Physical Restraint in Psychiatric Hospitals: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
Junrong Ye, Zhichun Xia, Chen Wang, Yao Liao, Yu Xu, Yunlei Zhang, Lin Yu, Sijue Li, Jiankui Lin, Aixiang Xiao
Frontiers in Psychiatry vol: 12 year: 2021
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.576662
3. What factors contribute to the need for physical restraint in institutionalized residents in Taiwan?
Ching-Fang Chien, Ling-Chun Huang, Yang-Pei Chang, Chung-Fen Lin, Chih-Cheng Hsu, Yuan-Han Yang, Tai-Heng Chen
PLOS ONE vol: 17 issue: 11 first page: e0276058 year: 2022
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276058
4. Defining chemical restraint: A preliminary step towards measurement and quality assessment
Catherine Hupé, Caroline Larue, Damien Contandriopoulos
Aggression and Violent Behavior vol: 77 first page: 101926 year: 2024
doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2024.101926
5. Physical Restraint Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Intensive Care Nurses in Turkey: The Effectiveness of an In-Service Training Program
Elmas YILMAZ, Selda KARAVELİ ÇAKIR, Işıl IŞIK ANDSOY
Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences vol: 7 issue: 3 first page: 1 year: 2023
doi: 10.30621/jbachs.1085844
6. Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Intensive Care Nurses on the Use of Physical Retainers
Diğdem LAFÇI, Ebru YILDIZ KARADENİZ, Hatice ŞEN
Izmir Democracy University Health Sciences Journal vol: 6 issue: 2 first page: 224 year: 2023
doi: 10.52538/iduhes.1140678
7. Coding for Physical Restraint Status Among Hospitalized Patients: a 2019 National Inpatient Sample Analysis
James Luccarelli, Chana A. Sacks, Colleen Snydeman, Christopher Luccarelli, Felicia Smith, Scott R. Beach, Thomas H. McCoy Jr
Journal of General Internal Medicine vol: 38 issue: 11 first page: 2461 year: 2023
doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08179-3
8. The management of psychiatric emergencies in Africa: A scoping review of restraint and seclusion practices in clinical settings and their impacts
Shankar Chakkera, Julia Sieg, Theodora Khofi, Rosemina Ayieko, Brandon A. Knettel
Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health vol: 12 year: 2025
doi: 10.1017/gmh.2025.10052
9. The effect of educational intervention on nurses' knowledge, attitude, intention, practice and incidence rate of physical restraint use
Fatemeh Eskandari, Khatijah Lim Abdullah, Nor Zuraida Zainal, Li Ping Wong
Nurse Education in Practice vol: 32 first page: 52 year: 2018
doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.07.007
10. Physical restraint: perceptions of nurse managers, registered nurses and healthcare assistants
P. Leahy‐Warren, V. Varghese, M.R. Day, M. Curtin
International Nursing Review vol: 65 issue: 3 first page: 327 year: 2018
doi: 10.1111/inr.12434
11. Physical restraint and associated agitation
Shimon Cohen, Avraham Meyer, Nisim Ifrach, Sara Dichtwald
Nursing in Critical Care vol: 29 issue: 5 first page: 1132 year: 2024
doi: 10.1111/nicc.13130
12. A Quasi‐experimental study on prevention and reduction of involuntary treatment at home (PRITAH) in people with dementia
Angela M. H. J. Mengelers, Michel H. C. Bleijlevens, Hilde Verbeek, Elizabeth Capezuti, Jan P. H. Hamers
Journal of Clinical Nursing vol: 31 issue: 21-22 first page: 3250 year: 2022
doi: 10.1111/jocn.16163