Original Research
Academic nurse leaders’ interpretation of concepts and priorities related to the examination of scientific short papers, dissertations and theses – Part 2
Curationis | Vol 16, No 4 | a1410 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v16i4.1410
| © 1993 H. Brink
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 31 March 1993 | Published: 31 March 1993
Submitted: 31 March 1993 | Published: 31 March 1993
About the author(s)
H. Brink,, South AfricaFull Text:
PDF (404KB)Abstract
During the first round of the study panel members were asked to comment on the kinds of evaluation instruments they considered appropriate. The responses did not indicate clearly their preferences except that no one was in favour of a detailed evaluation instrument which indicated weights for each criterion.
Keywords
No related keywords in the metadata.
Metrics
Total abstract views: 2227Total article views: 1721