Original Research

Academic nurse leaders’ interpretation of concepts and priorities related to the examination of scientific short papers, dissertations and theses – Part 2

H. Brink
Curationis | Vol 16, No 4 | a1410 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v16i4.1410 | © 1993 H. Brink | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 31 March 1993 | Published: 31 March 1993

About the author(s)

H. Brink,, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (404KB)

Share this article

Bookmark and Share


During the first round of the study panel members were asked to comment on the kinds of evaluation instruments they considered appropriate. The responses did not indicate clearly their preferences except that no one was in favour of a detailed evaluation instrument which indicated weights for each criterion.


No related keywords in the metadata.


Total abstract views: 1149
Total article views: 1232

Crossref Citations

No related citations found.