Original Research
Practice standards for quality clinical decision-making in nursing
Submitted: 28 September 2006 | Published: 28 September 2006
About the author(s)
E Arries, Faculty of Health, School of Nursing, University of Johannesburg, South AfricaFull Text:
PDF (491KB)Abstract
Clinical decision-making is a critical component of nursing practice, as the life of the patient is at stake. The quality of clinical decision-making is, therefore, essential in delivering quality nursing care. The facilitation of quality clinical decision-making in nursing requires the development of standards to monitor, evaluate and implement remedial actions that improve on the quality of clinical decision-making (Muller, 2002:203; Beyea & Nicoll, 1999:495). However, there are no such practice standards against which the quality of clinical decision-making by nurses can be evaluated and assessed.
A qualitative, explorative, descriptive and standard formulation research design (Mouton & Marais, 1990:45-46; Muller, 1990:49-55) has been followed to develop standards for quality clinical decision-making in nursing. Standard development was based on the principles described by Muller (in Booyens, 1998:607-608; 636-637), and consists of development and quantification phases that are modified to meet the requirements for instrument development, as described by Lynn (1986:382-385). The formulation of these practice-standards was derived deductively from a conceptual framework. The conceptual framework was constructed based on an exploration and description of the expectations of the stakeholders about quality clinical decisionmaking in nursing and a literature study on clinical decision-making. To ensure the credibility of the standards for clinical decision-making in nursing, principles of logic, prolonged engagement, triangulation, peer-group discussion, dense description, stepwise repetition and an investigative audit (Lincoln & Guba, 1985:289-331) were adhered to. Two experts were consulted to validate the standards for quality clinical decisionmaking in nursing.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 7082Total article views: 9730
Crossref Citations
1. Midwives’ ethical practice in selected labour units in Tshwane, Gauteng Province, South Africa
J M Mathibe-Neke, M M Mashego
South African Journal of Bioethics and Law first page: 17 year: 2022
doi: 10.7196/SAJBL.2022.v15i1.765
2. The design, development and evaluation of a self-instructional module for nursing practice standards
June Anonson, Mary Ellen Walker
Open Journal of Nursing vol: 03 issue: 08 first page: 539 year: 2013
doi: 10.4236/ojn.2013.38073
3. Nursing prioritization of the patient need for care: A tacit knowledge embedded in the clinical decision‐making literature
Sarah Lake, Cheryle Moss, Jan Duke
International Journal of Nursing Practice vol: 15 issue: 5 first page: 376 year: 2009
doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2009.01778.x
4. Moral distress and ethical challenges in midwifery experiences: A scoping review
Mansoureh Hasanzadeh, Zeinab Hashemi, Zohreh Shahhosseini
Nursing Ethics year: 2026
doi: 10.1177/09697330251407219
5. A Structural Model on the Nursing Competencies of Nursing Simulation Learners
Soo Jin Park, Eun Sun Ji
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing vol: 48 issue: 5 first page: 588 year: 2018
doi: 10.4040/jkan.2018.48.5.588
6. A clinical improvement project to develop and implement a decision‐making framework for the use of seclusion
Sandra Hyde, Paul Fulbrook, Keryn Fenton, Michael Kilshaw
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing vol: 18 issue: 6 first page: 398 year: 2009
doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2009.00631.x
7. Experiences of nurses and midwives in policy development in low- and middle-income countries: Qualitative systematic review
Josephine Etowa, Adele Vukic, Megan Aston, Damilola Iduye, Shelley Mckibbon, Awoala George, Chioma Nkwocha, Binita Thapa, Getachew Abrha, Justine Dol
International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances vol: 5 first page: 100116 year: 2023
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2022.100116